THE MISUSE OF CANADIAN PRIVACY LAWS FACILITATES DELAY

 FROM CAPRICIOUS JUSTICE:

DELAY TACTICS ARE REWARDED. THIS IS NOT JUST NOR RIGHT. THE TACTICS AND THE PERSONS USING THESE TACTICS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND PROSECUTED..

WHEN DELAY TACTICS AND COLOR OF LAW PROCESSES ARE USED TO ALLOW THE PERPETRATORS OF LOSS OR DAMAGE TO ESCAPE JUSTICE, THERE THERE SHOULD BE NO TIME LIMITS IN CASES  ATTEMPTING TO OBTAIN CIVIL REMEDY.

FOURTEEN YEARS AGO THIS ARTICLE WAS POSTED REPORTING ON MY EXPERIENCE ATTEMPTING TO DEAL WITH PRIVACY LAW SHIELDING CRIMINAL WRONGDOING IN THE CREATION OF PREJUDICIAL INFORMATION REGARDING MYSELF.

 

Sunday, 4 December 2011

LETTER RE: RCMP INFORMATION AND PRIVACY

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Place de Ville, Tower B                                                      
3^rd Floor
Ottawa Ontario KIA 1H3


LETTER RE:  RCMP INFORMATION AND PRIVACY

August 29 2011

File Number # GA-3952-3-04094/11

REQUEST DENIED: Answers to Privacy Act Complaint Form

Q-4 Reply: My complaint is that information has been accumulated regarding myself which is not disclosed to me when I request the information. The actions and words of Police and other persons indicate that there is prejudicial information held regarding myself.

In some cases persons are complaining about my complaints; a complaint about unlawful behavior cannot be an unlawful complaint. Constantly monitoring, and creating records and entering onto private property and accosting me on my own property, unless there is a Public Safety emergency or theft or a Judicial Warrant has been issued is an unlawful action. Stalking or criminal harassment are offences which relate to the aforementioned information, it is not clever, it is overtly criminal or negligent to ignore the facts and accuse a person who is dealing with stalking and criminal harassment of criminal harassment because of the measures which are being taken to deal with the situation.

Q-5 Reply: I have made every effort, writing to the RCMP, as soon as the scheme was threatened, in Ottawa, on the advice of my Lawyer Charles Phippen QC; I was literally challenged that false accusations would be made to Police and other Authorities if I would not sign over all of my assets to my ex-wife Betty Collard. She declared her hatred of myself, her father and “all men”. She told me that she had been to see all of the neighbors who had come on to my property and done property damage and that she would spread false stories about me and encourage other persons to make complaints about me to Police and Regional Authority. Since that time in the early 1990’s I have regularly and correctly made application under the freedom of information act and by contacting every Law Officer I could to deal with the situation I was afflicted by. The responses were not of any useful nature and I would characterize the actions of Police Officers who were given the responsibility of dealing with my requests as uncooperative and even intimidating. The RCMP Policy of turning over all complainants about misuse of calls to Police misuse of the records kept by Police or complaints against Police to the same detachment were the prejudicial actions were taken is entirely counterproductive. Regardless of whom I contacted I have never received any meaningful cooperation and I think that persons who will not do their duty complain about the methods which must be used to obtain information when there is not a willing attitude of cooperation.

There are a large number of documents, too many to simply send off on the hope that you will finally do something about the misinformation and false record keeping. Bear in mind that if information is given to Police which is untrue, the person and the information cannot be protected or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are aiding a criminal and participating in a criminal offence. To reiterate, anything which is not true is false, and cannot be lawfully withheld .

Q6-Reply: (see recent attachments) Yes, I have repeatedly notified RCMP and other Government Agencies or Officials of my concerns. Are you aware of the fact that many complaint processes could be conducted by telephone?

Q7-Reply: You are asking for the names of persons who have not responded or have not responded properly to requests or complaints. If I thought that there was a disciplinary process I might be very interested in supplying the aforementioned names. At this point I will say that you have records which can be accessed, I get the impression that you wish to force work onto myself. I suggest that you are being paid to work and I am not.

Q8-Reply: My concerns are that I have been falsely characterized and that in order to accomplish this many false and exaggerated complaints and statements by others are cached in your files. I which to know each and every, and every single bit of the information which you are holding in connection with myself, my activities, my property and regarding fraudulent predictions which were made about what my behavior would be. I have reached the age of sixty-five years and I have not harmed anyone, is this not long enough that you would realise that the predictions of violence which were used to involve Police are false . The Police are not empowered to enforce obsequiousness or politeness. The Police are suppose to be protecting persons against violence. Many persons who interfere or trespass on private property are told to leave. Any fabrications which are developed in response to being humiliatingly routed are not bonafide complaints. Worse still I have contacted RCMP at the detachment level and that contact has made me aware that persons who complain about being ordered off of private property make totally unrelated, totally false complaints to Police to get even. This includes citizens, By Law Officers and Police. For that reason all of the files must be provided.

Q8-Reply: I expect to receive all information regarding myself in any way.

Q9-Reply: I expect to receive all information regarding myself in any way.

To Conclude: I have records, documents and a daily diary focused directly on the issue which is before us. I created a Supreme Court Writ regarding the creation of false characterisation and prevarication and in February 2000, at an interlocutory hearing the precedent was admitted that collusion could be written in a statement of claim in the form of an accusation of conspiracy. At this point Harold Turnham of Turnham, Woodland, Waddell, Raponni

A LETTER TO MY MP

THE LIBERAL CAUCUS SHOULD CHOOSE A LEADER WHO WILL WIN THE ELECTION. THE LEADER SHOULD DO ONLY THAT UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION. 

CANADIAN PRIVACY LAWS HELP CONSPIRATORS TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS.

I AM GOING TO WRITE ABOUT HOW MY EX-WIFE STARTED CONSPIRING WITH ANYONE SHE COULD TO TAKE OVER MY ASSETS AND SHE DID ACCOMPLISH THAT.

SEE MY POST ON  DITZKREIG

I HAVE GIVEN UP ON GOVERNMENT INFORMATION PROGRAMS

THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION, CANADA, HEADQUARTERS WHERE I HAVE ALWAYS EXPERIENCED OBFUSCATION.

IT HAS BEEN MANY YEARS SINCE I DID A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION INQUIRY.

I SUFFERED FROM DEFAMATION AND DISENFRANCHISEMENT. NOW, MANY YEARS HAVE PASSED. I STILL DO NOT KNOW HOW I  MIGHT PROCEED TO HOLD PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT THEY DID AGAINST MY INTERESTS. THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT, IN RETROSPECT, HAS BEEN TO ISOLATE ME AND LIMIT MY ABILITY TO GAIN FINANCIALLY FROM MY SKILLS AND EVEN FROM MY INHERITANCES.

I WAS PREVENTED FROM REMEDYING WHAT HAD DAMAGED ME BY NOT LETTING ME KNOW WHAT WAS HAPPENING AND BY AUTHORITIES NOT EVER TAKING MY DEMANDS FOR REMEDY SERIOUSLY. 

IT IS A MISAPPLICATION OF CITIZEN'S PRIVACY RIGHTS WHEN IT RESULTS IN THEIR INVULNERABILITY TO LAWFUL RECOURSE BY A VICTIM OF THEIR ACTS. 

THE NON-LITIGATION PACT THAT CHARACTERIZES THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW PROTECTS FRAUD, FALSE ACCUSATION, TRESPASS, VANDALISM AND OTHER CRIMINAL ACTS.

AN UNWILLINGNESS TO ACTUALLY LITIGATE  COMBINED WITH PRIVACY LAW MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW WHO THE PERPETRATORS OF CRIMES COMMITTED USING STEALTH TO HIDE THEIR IDENTITY TO BE  DISCOVERED.

1:13

Now playing

BOORS 003

568 views14 years ago

1:13

Now playing

BOORS 003

568 views14 years ago

3:14

Now playing

BOORS 001

370 views14 years ago

Now playing

I HAVE HIRED LAWYERS AND LITIGATED BEFORE APPEAL BOARDS AND COURTS BUT THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY MEANINGFUL LITIGATION BEFORE THOSE ADMINISTRATORS OF LAW, ALWAYS SOME DISTRACTION WOULD BE CREATED, USUALLY BACKED BY A SPURIOUS DEFAMATION OF MYSELF OR BY SOME ALLEGED OVERRIDING PRINCIPLE WHICH PORTRAYS THE OFFENDER AGAINST MYSELF OR MY PROPERTY AS A VICTIM OF MY OVERZEALOUS LITIGATION.

I WRITE TO MY MLA OFFICES. I CANNOT FIND OUT WHO ACCUSED ME OF WHAT.

 

6 of 2,355

Print all

In new window

Lindon Collard 4129 Otter Point Road Sooke V9Z0K2 250 516 0190: I have a secondary residence at #300 1317 Hillside where I thought you were the MLA

Lindon Collard <lindoncollard@gmail.com>	Mon, May 6, 9:08 AM (2 days ago)
to Murray.Rankin.MLA

I lived in Vancouver when your Father pursued what I thought was a True Left agenda.

I was driven off my Rockcliffe Apartments in the Oaklands area in Victoria in 2001 by the 

misuse of Police and By-Law  through the placement of numerous fake complaints against 

me by exclusively the residents of the Alf Toone Co-op. Many times the Police and By-Law 

came out to Otter Point as a result of more false complaints about me after I had been 

driven off of my Victoria home where my children had lived with me at the Rockcliffe. The 

Alf Toone Co-op had accessed false information about me from Otter Point.  

In August 1979 I had sold my business and I bought a very inexpensive acreage and a

nearly finished home at Otter Point BC. After I bought it the house was stripped of  

plumbing and electrical appliances, copper wire and copper pipes by people who lived 

up the hill who had conflicted with two previous owners. I did not know about any of this 

nor did I know any of the people involved in the many conflicts. 

By June 20 1980 I personally  repaired and finished the house which was being lived in 

by the previous owner without gyproc and paint and floor coverings having been done. 

I was robbed of my business and personal goods and the house which I had finished after 

eight months of work was burnt down. Later the same people cut down trees and 

stripped topsoil and trucked it all off to sell. I could never bring the perpetrators to justice, 

they defended themselves by defaming me and every authority believed them while I had

just owned a business in Vancouver where I had a AAA industrial Credit Rating with the 

Bank of Nova Scotia and a letter of commendation from Manpower and Immigration as a 

result of my training course.

TRUE LEFT click to enter blog.TRUE LEFT IS THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 

THE LATEST POST IS ABOUT 

THE MISUSE OF MY PROPERTY 

TAXES. THE ONLY OTHER POST 

IS ABOUT "POST MONARCHIC 

SOCIALISM" AS "TRUE LEFT".

WHICH DECLARES THAT 

ALL CITIZENS MUST RECEIVE

THE FOOD, HOUSING, 

CLOTHING, EDUCATION AND 

ENTERTAINMENT THEY NEED 

TO LIVE PLEASANT, SECURE 

AND UNWORRIED LIVES WHILE 

THEY ARE FREE TO IMPROVE 

THEMSELVES AND TO PURSUE 

THEIR ARTISTIC, ECONOMIC 

AND EMPLOYMENT AIMS.

I DO NOT GET ANYTHING FOR MY TAXES. 

I WAS FLAT OUT TOLD AT MY OTTER POINT HOMESTEAD BY BOTH THE LOCAL RCMP AND BY THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT OFFICERS THAT THEY WOULD NEVER DO ANYTHING FOR ME. I WOULD CITE HOW MUCH I PAID IN PROPERTY TAXES. THEY SAID THEY DID NOT CARE AND THEY WOULD NOT DEAL WITH THE OBVIOUS DESTRUCTION OF MY LAND AND MY BUILDING SITE.

THEY SAID THEY WOULD POTENTIALLY COME HERE IN FORCE, HOWEVER, 24/7.

WHAT LIFE RUINING MADNESS IS THIS?

MY WRITTEN COMPLAINTS, PLEADINGS AND APPLICATIONS, AND A BRITISH COLUMBIA SUPREME COURT  ACTION  WERE AND ARE ALWAYS IGNORED.  

MY POLITICAL PRINCIPLES, WHICH DEMAND A FAIR RETURN FOR TAXES PAID, ARE VIOLATED BY PERSONS WHO FOLLOW THE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF MANDARIN INDIFFERENCE AND SELF PAYMENT.