YOU HAVE NOT READ MY LETTER OR THE FILE

December 3^rd 2011                                                                  

J……………Senior Privacy Investigator:

Thank you for your phone call last Friday morning. Unfortunately a few minutes into the conversation I had the distinct impression that you had not read my letter sent to you by email. In case you did not get it, I will post the letter, without including your name so as not to violate your privacy and you can read it on the internet.

Someone arrived at my door, sorry if I was abrupt, not sorry for becoming disenchanted when I realized you knew nothing about the first issue I was going to raise: what was the identity of the person who came to my home, said I was unkempt and foaming at the mouth and then entered into Police files themselves or by reporting this absolute nonsense to Police. I am sixty five years old and I have never ever seen anyone foaming at the mouth. Such lies which are so obvious should be detected by competent Police.

In addition to my letter I put this to you J…………, someone caused damaging and disconcerting apprehensions invasions and injuries through the unnecessary misuse of Police and Regional Authority. As much today as the day that the events occurred, I want to find out who made the false accusations or observations or who lied to Police and litigate against them and prosecute them. If there are no such persons that information I require every bit as much to take similar action against Police for what they have done without any lawful purpose and without having been deceived.

I want all of the information which has been accumulated regarding myself regardless of the source and regardless of whom has this information. Mr J…………, all of it, do you understand me.

Lindon Collard

J…………..
 Senior Privacy Investigator
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada



Sir:

I was unable to get back to you until now. I have been mostly laying down for the last few months. I have had someone come to assist me.

I had my typist check several boxes of documents but we did not find all of the documents, we will continue to try to find the accident report from 1997.

As I looked at documents I was struck by how my privacy is so completely and rigorously violated through the creation of completely baseless opinion and criticism. Many of the reports and observations are made by persons or civil servants who are trespassing. They are conducting themselves in such a manner as to be doing what I do not want them to do while they are on my property and thus unless they have judicial authorization they are trespassers. It is their intention to intimidate to create an atmosphere of fear of them and their ability to make things up and to violate the law without any fear of consequences, protected by a refusal to disclose who they are, who sent them and this false concept of privacy protects the unlawful acts of other persons which completely violate my privacy and the rights which I have as the owner of private property.

The violation of my right to privacy began in 1968 or 1970 when Insurance Company lawyers went to the offices of the Canadian National Railroad and convinced a junior clerk, Turner his name was, to destroy my identity, my educational and work history. He said to me “ I threw your paperwork in the garbage”.

When I purchased my property at Otter Point in 1979, local residents repeatedly entered my home, a local resident, Palfrey, undoubtedly burnt my home and possessions, he had threatened the previous owner that he would burn the house. Another local resident, Dennis Ireland, said to me that “he should hate me I lived in the house of the man that got him busted”.

My home which I had worked on myself for eight months, was burned to the ground June 20^th 1980. The Capital Regional District informed me that my existing foundation could not be reused as it was now no longer conforming, being 55 feet from Larulla Creek. I found a new home site on the highest point of my twelve and one half acres. The contractor, Cliff Beance, allowed local residents onto the property and they cut down all of the trees between my property and the adjacent Palfrey property. They dug out the creek which had been created by their unlawful dam project, turning it into an unattractive and dangerous three to four metre deep ditch. With the cooperation of Ron Shambrook and my contractor, local residents, Norman Reid, Dennis Ireland, Wilfred Palfrey and several other persons dug a huge hole with an excavator at the base of the hill my home was supposed to be located on and my contractor built my home there, in violation of the site plan and the contract and closer to the creek they had created than my previous home was. Doing this violated numerous regulations of the Canada Construction rules, the book might be called the Canadian Building Code. There is no way that the building inspectors of the Capital Regional District should have allowed this to happen. I made every effort to deal with this situation and what happened was a further violation of my privacy as the offending Capital Regional District Officers started complaining to the RCMP and have brought them to my property without lawful purpose for decades. Each time that a Capital Regional District employee brings other persons with him who are not necessary to for instance to speak to me or serve a document, the act is an act of assault. There is no necessity for anyone to come to my home, my phone number is well known and I have postal service and in addition an address for service box.

I have tried to protect myself from violations of my privacy and from violations of my private property rights. I require complete privacy and I require uninterrupted peace at my home and my business because I am subject to collapse when I am confronted, intimidated, humiliated or most terrible of all made subject to armed intervention through the uttering of falsehoods. Surely there must be some way that I can live somewhere and operate a business as well without being constantly interrupted, harassed and trespassed upon.

It is absolutely the intention of the enforcement officers of the Capital Regional District, the RCMP, Victoria Bylaw Officers and the Victoria Police to scare the living hell right out of me. They expect me to endure trespass, harassment and collapse without saying anything or doing anything to protect myself. The take the ludicrous position that I am harassing them when they come to my property and create a conflict which I absolutely do not intend to let go. I want these persons to be punished as the law dictates, not to lock horns with every other law officer and government official and to be falsely denounced as some mentally ill troublemaker. I do not go to other persons pieces of property and get into conflicts with them. If anyone comes to my property and creates a conflict I want to take legal action against them to obtain compensation for any damage which has been done or for collapse which has been caused and I want to prosecute them because the entire scheme and the actions of everyone involved are criminal.

There is no way that the situation I outlined above should create any privileged or private information or files. I want to find out every single thing that was done or said by every person to the RCMP or whom is an RCMP officer.

I will hirer an employee to search files for the accident report which was fraudulently created by Officer Howse in 1997. Andrew Dolan, the person who brought the RCMP to my home July 26^th is a violent and dangerous individual. I am truly in fear that he might come to my home or business and injure or even kill me. He has been on my property on more than one occasion and more than one person was carrying a police baton. What do you think they plan to use these sticks for Mr. J………… Andrew Dolan has been accused of assault on more than one occasion. This is the beginning of our correspondence regarding privacy. Some of these events may be a provincial privacy issue, I will send the Provincial Privacy Commissioner a copy of this letter and I will send copies to anyone else I think should intervene or provide me with information.

Lindon Collard

LETTER RE: RCMP INFORMATION AND PRIVACY

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Place de Ville, Tower B                                                      
3^rd Floor
Ottawa Ontario KIA 1H3


LETTER RE:  RCMP INFORMATION AND PRIVACY

August 29 2011

File Number # GA-3952-3-04094/11

REQUEST DENIED: Answers to Privacy Act Complaint Form

Q-4 Reply: My complaint is that information has been accumulated regarding myself which is not disclosed to me when I request the information. The actions and words of Police and other persons indicate that there is prejudicial information held regarding myself.

In some cases persons are complaining about my complaints; a complaint about unlawful behaviour cannot be an unlawful complaint. Constantly monitoring, and creating records and pursuing a person onto his own property, unless there is a Public Safety emergency or theft or a Judicial Warrant has been issued is an unlawful action, stalking or criminal harassment are offences which relate to the aforementioned information, it is not clever, it is overtly criminal or negligent to ignore the facts and accuse a person who is dealing with stalking and criminal harassment of criminal harassment because of the measures which are being taken to deal with the situation.

Q-5 Reply: I have made every effort, writing to the RCMP , as soon as the scheme was threatened ,in Ottawa ,on the advice of my Lawyer Charles Phippen QC; I was literally challenged that false accusations would be made to Police and other Authorities if I would not sign over all of my assets to my ex-wife Betty Collard. She declared her hatred of myself, her father and “all men”. She told me that she had been to see all of the neighbours who had come on to my property and done property damage and that she would spread false stories about me and encourage other persons to make complaints about me to Police and Regional Authority. Since that time in the early 1990’s I have regularly and correctly made application under the freedom of information act and by contacting every Law Officer I could to deal with the situation I was afflicted by. The responses were not of any useful nature and I would characterise the actions of Police Officers who were given the responsibility of dealing with my requests as uncooperative and even intimidating. The RCMP Policy of turning over all complainants about misuse of calls to Police misuse of the records kept by Police or complaints against Police to the same detachment were the prejudicial actions were taken is entirely counterproductive. Regardless of whom I contacted I have never received any meaningful cooperation and I think that persons who will not do their duty complain about the methods which must be used to obtain information when there is not a willing attitude of cooperation.

There are a large number of documents, too many to simply send off on the hope that you will finally do something about the misinformation and false record keeping. Bear in mind that if information is given to Police which is untrue, the person and the information cannot be protected or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are aiding a criminal and participating in a criminal offence. To reiterate, anything which is not true is false, and cannot be lawfully withheld .

Q6-Reply: (see recent attachments) Yes, I have repeatedly notified RCMP and other Government Agencies or Officials of my concerns. Are you aware of the fact that many complaint processes could be conducted by telephone?

Q7-Reply: You are asking for the names of persons who have not responded or have not responded properly to requests or complaints. If I thought that there was a disciplinary process I might be very interested in supplying the aforementioned names. At this point I will say that you have records which can be accessed, I get the impression that you wish to force work onto myself. I suggest that you are being paid to work and I am not.

Q8-Reply: My concerns are that I have been falsely characterised and that in order to accomplish this many false and exaggerated complaints and statements by others are cached in your files. I which to know each and every, and every single bit of the information which you are holding in connection with myself, my activities, my property and regarding fraudulent predictions which were made about what my behaviour would be. I have reached the age of sixty-five years and I have not harmed anyone, is this not long enough that you would realise that the predictions of violence which were used to involve Police are false . The Police are not empowered to enforce obsequiousness or politeness. The Police are suppose to be protecting persons against violence. Many persons who interfere or trespass on private property are told to leave. Any fabrications which are developed in response to being humiliatingly routed are not bonafide complaints. Worse still I have contacted RCMP at the detachment level and that contact has made me aware that persons who complain about being ordered off of private property make totally unrelated, totally false complaints to Police to get even. This includes citizens, By Law Officers and Police. For that reason all of the files must be provided.

Q8-Reply: I expect to receive all information regarding myself in any way.

Q9-Reply: I expect to receive all information regarding myself in any way.

To Conclude: I have records, documents and a daily diary focused directly on the issue which is before us. I created a Supreme Court Writ regarding the creation of false characterisation and prevarication and in February 2000, at an interlocutory hearing the precedent was admitted that collusion could be written in a statement of claim in the form of an accusation of conspiracy. At this point Harold Turnham of Turnham, Woodland, Waddell, Raponni

Lindon Collard